MeleeMarkets Live
Polymarket Sports Closed

Set Handicap: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida (-1.5) vs Nicolas Jarry (+1.5)

Resolves Oct 28, 2026

33%chance
– 0.0pt over 4h
0%50%100%Oct 22Oct 22

Polymarket traders are currently pricing "Set Handicap: Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida (-1.5) vs Nicolas Jarry (+1.5)" at a 33% probability, roughly flat over the last 4h (0 point change).

Volume (24h)
$102
Total volume
$102
Liquidity
$8.4K
Our history
7 hours
Resolves
6d

How this resolves

This market refers to the tennis match between Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida and Nicolas Jarry in the Cali, originally scheduled for October 21, 2026 at 11:00AM ET.
This market will resolve to "Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida" if Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida wins by 2 or more sets than Nicolas Jarry, based on the final completed score. Otherwise, it will resolve to "Nicolas Jarry."
If the match begins but is not completed due to retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve 50-50, unless the outcome of this market has already been unconditionally determined by the completed portion of play under the match format published by the tournament organizer for that round. For example, if the deciding set has begun when the match ends, Matheus Pucinelli de Almeida can no longer win by 2 or more sets, and this market will resolve to "Nicolas Jarry."
If the match is canceled before play begins, or a result has not been determined by November 4, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve 50-50.
Resolution will be based on official Challenger results.

Resolution rules as published by Polymarket — MeleeMarkets doesn't set or interpret these, we just mirror them.

Alert me when the odds move

It is at 33% now. Pick the number you care about.

%
Embed these odds on your site

Paste this where you want the card. It updates by itself and links back here. Add &theme=dark to the address for a dark card.

Odds are mirrored from Polymarket's public market data and may lag the live order book slightly. Informational only — not financial advice. How we source data.

What do you think?

A reader poll, separate from the market odds above.

View all